Page 2 of 2

Re: Lenovo Tab 2 A7-10F and Huawei e220 dongle. Troubleshoot

Posted: 21 Mar 2016, 02:04
by SumTingWong
Root access is used just by PPP, FX, and Flashr.
I don't use anything except Play store apps. Maybe it's because I rooted the device using kingroot and then replaced it with supersu and it left some sort of change?
If you want, I can set up teamviewer host on my tablet to let you remotely check what's happening.

Re: Lenovo Tab 2 A7-10F and Huawei e220 dongle. Troubleshoot

Posted: 21 Mar 2016, 19:57
by Josh
SumTingWong wrote:Maybe it's because I rooted the device using kingroot and then replaced it with supersu and it left some sort of change?
That's a possible cause. However, if root programs get the root permission dialogue from SuperSU after the first install, then the "su" installation should be O.K.

Direct access to your device is not necessary - you could post both a "dmesg" and a "logcat -d" output file though, created immediately after a connection attempt.

Re: Lenovo Tab 2 A7-10F and Huawei e220 dongle. Troubleshoot

Posted: 23 Mar 2016, 09:21
by SumTingWong
Here they are.

Re: Lenovo Tab 2 A7-10F and Huawei e220 dongle. Troubleshoot

Posted: 24 Mar 2016, 12:20
by Josh
The "logcat" looks as it should. The system accepts the network connection which is the main hurdle for user-created network interfaces:

Code: Select all

D/ConnectivityService(  634): getActiveNetworkInfo:[type: PPP[], state: CONNECTED/CONNECTED, reason: (unspecified), extra: PPPWIDGET
The "dmesg" however does not show anything related to a freshly plugged USB device. Are you sure you caught the moment when you plugged the modem in?

It would help to see the whole sequence of plugging the modem, preparing and connecting in the dmesg log.

Re: Lenovo Tab 2 A7-10F and Huawei e220 dongle. Troubleshoot

Posted: 25 Mar 2016, 08:37
by SumTingWong
This is just after starting the tablet. One dmesg before, the other after plugging in the modem and connecting.

Re: Lenovo Tab 2 A7-10F and Huawei e220 dongle. Troubleshoot

Posted: 24 Apr 2016, 09:12
by Josh
I did not reply yet because I'm somewhat out of ideas.

In the meantime, I did some clean-up in the code for setting the default route. Did you try with the current version?